Sharing Secrets II

I guess the Washington Post felt left out, given yesterday's editorial in the Times. In a very long piece, the Post tells us:

An examination of [Kerry's military] record, supplemented by interviews with the candidate, his crewmates and some skeptics, found little to undermine Kerry's portrayal of his service.

But I guess "there's no story here" doesn't provide enough column inches?

Meanwhile, there's no similar story about Bush's war record, perhaps because they can't find many people who remember his later service?

Comments