tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5973827.post2102193308305033985..comments2024-01-11T07:40:01.736-05:00Comments on The Stopped Clock: As The Race Boils Down To Two On Each Side....Aaronhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16523334580402022332noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5973827.post-52272441058816003772008-02-07T12:49:00.000-05:002008-02-07T12:49:00.000-05:00As I stated up front, the list wasn't intended to ...As I stated up front, the list wasn't intended to be fair. ;-) It's certainly not comprehensive.<BR/><BR/>The idea of a Clinton machine "concerned with perpetual candidacy" - I understand where it comes from. But how perpetual can it be? There was Bill, now there's Hillary, and then... it's over. (<A HREF="http://bushclintonforever.googlepages.com/" REL="nofollow">Although some may disagree</A>.)Aaronhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16523334580402022332noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5973827.post-60671648366600435582008-02-07T12:14:00.000-05:002008-02-07T12:14:00.000-05:00I'm not sure I entirely agree with your list of pr...I'm not sure I entirely agree with your list of pros and cons. However, they're worth considering. My objection to Clinton is that she's part of a political machine that is more concerned with perpetual candidacy and obtaining power than with doing the actual work of government. For Obama, he's adopted a style of political rhetoric I disdain, but he's apparently able to inspire and motivate like Reagan, whom Obama has praised. Yuck. The bit about McCain endorsing perpetual war is enough. No! And like you, Mitt who?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com